Fresh Gynaecological Evidence – Conviction unsafe all counts

Judgment was today handed down by the Court of Appeal in Consolidated Appeals of R v S , B , C and R . All had their convictions quashed apart from R who due to other fresh evidence against him lost his appeal .

The Court was considering the scenario where fresh Gynaecological Evidence is called after conviction which demonstrates either the evidence of abuse given at trial was untrue or was significantly undermined . This might be due either to simply wrong expert work or developments in the interpretation of the signs of sexual abuse .

S represented   by QualitySolicitors Jordans was linked to the other 3 cases which were referred by the Criminal Cases Review Commission .

The Court concluded in S who was convicted in 2002 at Truro Crown Court of Rape , Attempted Rape and Indecency’s that all of his convictions were unsafe . The Prosecution Expert at Trial alleged damage to the Complainants genitalia consistent with sexual abuse . Fresh Evidence heard at the Appeal cast serious doubt on those findings .

The Crown accepted the Fresh Evidence but sought to argue it only related to certain counts and other counts remained safe . The Court however agreed with submissions made on behalf of the appellant that the evidence of the Expert at Trial went to the heart of the case and that evidence must have weighed heavily in the jury’s consideration .

As Mark Barlow instructed Counsel for the Appellant pointed out

” the medical evidence at Trial shone like a beacon “ .

The Court of Appeal adopts that analogy in its judgment in quashing the all convictions .

This important case demonstrates the importance of thorough investigation in sexual offence cases sand that evidence of sexual abuse should not be accepted on face value . That the Court of Appeal will always be open to receiving such fresh evidence which clearly undermines the safety of the convictions .

QualitySolicitors Jordans are pursuing further similar cases challenging medical evidence given at trial .

S was represented by Mark Newby and David Crossling from QualitySolicitors Jordans

Counsel was S was Mark Barlow of Garden Court North Chambers Manchester

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.